Hi Mohan,I tested the JTAPI CiscoCall.conference(Call[]) on the multi CUCM clusters:Conditions:addressA1 and addressA2 are owned by clusterA;addressB is owned by clusterBTest steps:addressA1 ---(call) -->adddressB, and the call is answered. (there a...
Hi,Do the UCM provides failover functions? (in the sandbox labs, there are 2 UCM server).if it does, how to make the current active UCM server (the VM) disactive?Thanks,Simon
Hi Mohan,You reply so fast. not saw you response before I sent the above item.So do you mean that there is no way to establish the conference for all participants' perspectives? JTAPI does not support it, right?Simon
Hi Mohan,As the above, after I set the conference bridge, it almost satisfies my exceptions.More queries about the above case, how to make the triple sides have the same result (I mean, how to let the conference be established for all participants' p...
What I expect is that when the call crosses cluster, how to make conference.after I set the conference bridge for address A1, address A2 and address B, following works to establish an conference for address B's perspective , while not for address A1 ...
Hi Mohan,it does not work manually.what's do you mean by MRGL ? And how to set conf bridge to an address (where is the document link)?but following steps work for an conference on JTAPI and manually.addressA1 ---(call) -->adddressB, and the call is a...
Hi Mohan,Thanks for your quick reply.I tried with call1B.conference(call2B) and call1B.conference(new Call[] {call2B}), neither of them works.both of them have the same behaviors:the error message is com.cisco.jtapi.PlatformExceptionImpl: Could not ...
