cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
10311
Views
20
Helpful
22
Replies

Authenticated Received Chain (ARC)

sdonovan123
Level 1
Level 1

I was reading about the newest email protection standard.  Can you say if this will be implemented on the IronPorts?

https://www.dmarcanalyzer.com/arc-is-here/

Thanks!

22 Replies 22

Libin Varghese
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

I do not see any active feature requests to implement that at the moment.

You could open a TAC case or contact your accounts team to file a new one.

Thank You!

Libin Varghese

Hi Libin,

 

Its been about two years now since this topic was discussed. What is PG stance on this feature?  Did it make to AsyncOS 13.x?  Or was any logic added to the ESA to honor the ARC values?  This feature would be uber beneficial.

 

Regards,


Chet

mattdrury
Level 1
Level 1

Thank you. I'd like to see this as well, given Google's backing, and the arc=pass entries I'm seeing on my DMARC reports.

Hi Matt

you can do ARC validation today with the Ironports just need to do some scripting:

a) in log subsription under global settings add the following three x-headers

ARC-Authentication-Results, ARC-Seal, ARC-Message-Signature

b) built a content filter like and PVO for the following for analysis phase

GUI_Trap_ARC: if (recv-listener == "InboundInterface") AND (header("ARC-Seal")) { log-entry("-- ARC-Seal detected --"); duplicate-quarantine("TrapARCPass"); }

 

it is up to you to decide what to do once you understand what ends up in your quarantine. We upload the three fields above to our SIEM for every message and can run pretty good reports on senders and ARC verdicts. I would highly recommend dropping all messages where the ARC-Authentication-Results are failing.

 

A typical string looks like this:

ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is
13.86.34.99) smtp.rcpttodomain=fmc-na.com smtp.mailfrom=yammer.com;
dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none
header.from=yammer.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none

 

So you need to create now a final message filter to parse for arc status and take action based on

results.

 

I hope that helps until we get official ARC inbound and outbound support.

 

-Marc

 

 

 

 

Hey Marc,



I just want to clarify my understanding...



If senders are using ARC, then the headers are there already.

You're adding log entries and quarantining a duplicate so you can investigate what is coming in and come up with a plan on how to handle this mail; the end result being a content filter that could be a "drop if arc=failed" or something similar?



Ken




Hi Ken,

 

yes your understanding is correct , this is what we are doing.

 

Since the ARC result headers combine the results of MX, SPF, DKIM , DMARC and ARC results it is a very good source for additional checks on verdicts.

 

Regards

Marc

ppreenja
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee
Hi All,

We do have an enhancement in place for the same. Please find below the link:
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvi29672/

Currently, there is no ETA as in which Async OS version will it be released, however, you can subscribe yourself to the notifications to this link and get regular updates to know once it is released in any future Async OS releases.

Regards,
Pratham

hartvig
Level 1
Level 1

Any news regarding support for the ARC protocol?

Cheers!

meliux
Level 1
Level 1

Could we please get an update on implementing ARC?

pkarelis
Level 1
Level 1

ETA Please!  I also asked my account team to ask the BU about this feature timeline. 

 

yeah please stop hiding an come with an ETA....

W.Tytko
Level 1
Level 1

When will it implemented ? We need ARC

svgeorgi
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

You can subscribe for the feature request mentioned previously by Libin or can talk with your Cisco Account Manager/s about its importance.

https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvi29672
It has been updated Jan 18, 2023, but no solution or advisory was published.