cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
769
Views
7
Helpful
1
Replies

Chassis Connectivity policy- Difference btw port channel ,global and none in admin state

Kumar Anand
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

I Just want to know what are the difference between port channel ,global and none in admin state option of chassis connectivity policy.

and benefits of using port channel in it , how will traffic flow if there is two link(multiple link) between FI and IOM in case of global.

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

devinchappell
Level 1
Level 1

Hi Kumar!

Your chassis connectivity policy works hand-in-hand with the chassis discovery policy. Your chassis discovery policy is global to the FI, and basically determines two key things:

1.) How many links need to be connected between an IOM and an FI before the UCS Domain will "see" the chassis as healthy, and

2.) How do we want to handle the connectivity between the IOM and the FI (referred to as "Link Grouping"). If Link Grouping is set to "Port Channel", the links between the IOM and the FI are bundled into an port-channel. If set to None, then the UCS proceeds to pin VNICs to the individual NIFs between the IOMs and the FIs (similar to how a 2200 would distribute its HIF pinning when you have multiple uplinks that aren't port-channeled).

Chassis connectivity policy allows us to overwrite the behavior set in point 2 on a per-chassis basis. So, your options are:

Global - Inherit the link grouping setting from the chassis discovery policy

Port Channel - Ignore the discovery policy and ensure that the links between the IOMs and the FI are bundled logically

None - Ignore the discovery policy and perform pinning based on the usual distribution mechanism.

As for benefits, the main impact is your total throughput. If you are set to "None", you have 1/2/4/8 (on a 2208 anyways) 10Gbe links, which means that at most your vNIC will be able to pass 10Gbe of traffic. Whereas if you are set to port-channel your vNIC gets pinned to a port-channel of all the links, so theoretically you get more throughput

Let me know if this helps!

Devin

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

devinchappell
Level 1
Level 1

Hi Kumar!

Your chassis connectivity policy works hand-in-hand with the chassis discovery policy. Your chassis discovery policy is global to the FI, and basically determines two key things:

1.) How many links need to be connected between an IOM and an FI before the UCS Domain will "see" the chassis as healthy, and

2.) How do we want to handle the connectivity between the IOM and the FI (referred to as "Link Grouping"). If Link Grouping is set to "Port Channel", the links between the IOM and the FI are bundled into an port-channel. If set to None, then the UCS proceeds to pin VNICs to the individual NIFs between the IOMs and the FIs (similar to how a 2200 would distribute its HIF pinning when you have multiple uplinks that aren't port-channeled).

Chassis connectivity policy allows us to overwrite the behavior set in point 2 on a per-chassis basis. So, your options are:

Global - Inherit the link grouping setting from the chassis discovery policy

Port Channel - Ignore the discovery policy and ensure that the links between the IOMs and the FI are bundled logically

None - Ignore the discovery policy and perform pinning based on the usual distribution mechanism.

As for benefits, the main impact is your total throughput. If you are set to "None", you have 1/2/4/8 (on a 2208 anyways) 10Gbe links, which means that at most your vNIC will be able to pass 10Gbe of traffic. Whereas if you are set to port-channel your vNIC gets pinned to a port-channel of all the links, so theoretically you get more throughput

Let me know if this helps!

Devin

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card