cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1456
Views
6
Helpful
3
Replies

VLAN change CoA

matteodapozzo
Level 5
Level 5

Hi ISE community,

one of our customers have the following scenario:

  • Wired access where employees and guests can connect
  • Switchports by default on corporate VLAN X
  • CWA for any non-domain PC with self registration portal

Now the customer asked to differentiate Guest traffic based on VLAN (all users authenticated on CWA portal with guest credentials).

I have done some test but basically the problem is that the endpoint does not recognize that the VLAN has changed and the IP is not beign refreshed by the client.

Anyone have any suggestion in order to achieve that ?

The objective is to have something that could differentiate guest traffic like another VLAN for guest traffic, another network ecc. I have tried to see if SGT could be an option but basically the target device (web proxy) do not recognize the TrustSec tag.

Do you think that assign the same network on different VLAN using VRFs could be an option?

Thanks.

M

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Existing discussions in the community on same

https://communities.cisco.com/thread/81859

https://communities.cisco.com/thread/78818?start=0&tstart=0

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

ognyan.totev
Level 5
Level 5

Hi ,yes you  can use different VRF ,as you know i am sure u can have different VRF for management other for DATA ,other for VOICE , in my deployment i have them and guest VLAN . But i have only wireless guest not wired ,nvm. I think you can creat new Authorization Profiles > New Authorization Profile and tag the VLAN you want for guest

After just add this profile to authorization rule .

You can test this too

Thank you ognyan for your feedback, I appreciate.

I would like to stay away from VLAN DHCP Release option because we don't know if the Guest clients have ActiveX or Java support. Please let me know.


Thanks again for your answer!

Existing discussions in the community on same

https://communities.cisco.com/thread/81859

https://communities.cisco.com/thread/78818?start=0&tstart=0