cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1759
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Doing Trunk and Vlan Interfaces in ASR1001X

wanhafizi2012
Level 1
Level 1

Dear all,

Currently we've obtained ASR1001X and the new redudancy configuration requires us to pass dot1q traffic through 2 interfaces. It seems we cannot familiarize ourself with trunking and vlan interface when it comes to pure L3 devices.

A diagram of the implementation is as attached.

Thankyou for your help in advance

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Elliott Willink
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

To do this I would use EVC's (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/ios_xe/cether/configuration/guide/xe_3s/ce_xe_3s_book/ce_evc-infra_xe.pdf)

I'm assuming the config is similar to the ASR900 implementation, which would be as follows:

bridge-domain 10
bridge-domain 20
bridge-domain 30


interface BDI10
    ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface BDI20
    ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface BDI30
    ip address 10.0.3.1 255.255.255.0
!

interface Ten0/0/0
    service instance 10 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 10
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 10
    service instance 20 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 20
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 20
    service instance 30 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 30
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 30

interface Ten0/0/1
    service instance 10 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 10
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 10
    service instance 20 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 20
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 20
    service instance 30 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 30
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 30

!

That should do it. Read up on EVC's and how they are implemented so you understand what is going on above, and can adjust the functionality of the interfaces as you need to. The service provider/EVC functionality is very powerful and you can do some very interesting stuff with L2/L3 traffic traffic.

Regards,

Elliott

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

Elliott Willink
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

To do this I would use EVC's (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/ios_xe/cether/configuration/guide/xe_3s/ce_xe_3s_book/ce_evc-infra_xe.pdf)

I'm assuming the config is similar to the ASR900 implementation, which would be as follows:

bridge-domain 10
bridge-domain 20
bridge-domain 30


interface BDI10
    ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface BDI20
    ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface BDI30
    ip address 10.0.3.1 255.255.255.0
!

interface Ten0/0/0
    service instance 10 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 10
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 10
    service instance 20 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 20
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 20
    service instance 30 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 30
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 30

interface Ten0/0/1
    service instance 10 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 10
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 10
    service instance 20 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 20
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 20
    service instance 30 ethernet
        encapsulation dot1q 30
        rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
        bridge-domain 30

!

That should do it. Read up on EVC's and how they are implemented so you understand what is going on above, and can adjust the functionality of the interfaces as you need to. The service provider/EVC functionality is very powerful and you can do some very interesting stuff with L2/L3 traffic traffic.

Regards,

Elliott

jroy777
Level 1
Level 1

So I have a 1001-X and I want to trunk 3 vlans on my Lan interface to a fortinet switch. The scenario above looks like it keeps all vlans segmented across both sides of the ASR which would be great if we had vlans on the wan side of the ASR. It connect via a 10G layer 2 network with no vlans assigned. Doesnt seem like this scenario above would work for that.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card