Greetings,The customer has 2 BGP links towards us, separated dual homed (PE1-CE1 & PE2-CE2), who is asking why they are receiving traffic on link No.1 even they have already configured route-map to deny all routes imported from & exported to PE1. The...
Greetings,On an international L2 VPN service, the customer is complaining about latency.Here are several ping tests on the 2 PE routers:RouterA#ping mpls pseudowire b.b.b.b vcid source a.a.a.a repeat nSuccess rate is 100 percent (100/100), round-trip...
Greetings,I'm checking the "show bgp x.x.x.x" output in 3 different XR routers A, B & C in an ISP environment.Here's an example as the best path part of the output:Path #1: Received by speaker 0 Advertised IPv4 Unicast paths to peers (in unique updat...
Hey guys, here's my problems:1. (0109-0.png) I want to do a experiment using serial ports so I changed the "slot 1" of both R1 & R2 to NM-4T (slot 0 cannot be changed). But when I connect their Serial1/0 with the RJ45-like button on the left side, th...
Hey guys, I got a problem.In the picture attached, R1 & R4 are running iBGP with 192.168.12.1, 192.168.34.4 and "next-hop-self" eabled. Now R6 wants to ping 5.5.5.5 which is R5's loopback0, and I know it would fail. Because the next-hop of 5.5.5.5 is...
Hi @Georg Pauwen , I agree with that. But I suppose what they mean is the traffic is too huge to be considered as control traffic since they have a comparison of CE1 to CE2. Even just for studying, I wonder if there's something we can examine and exp...
@Kumaresan Ravichandran ,Thanks for replying. I'm not sure what you mean by "under varying network loads" but I just simply did the ping test on the same routers several times within an hour this morning. BTW, a senior colleague just told me it's nor...
Hi @MHM Cisco World,So sorry, I found that I input the wrong x.x.x.x on router C, it was a misunderstanding. And it seems that I cannot delete my article(?) so maybe lets just keep it.
